A Look at our Town Gorleston-on-Sea,   Resort  Yesteryear development of Bells Road Village to town Matthes bakery Gorleston heroes A Gorleston Miscellany Links, news, Events, Sponsors & Conservation The Treacherous North sea Gorleston resort today FShort Blue  & A riverside stroll

 

 

 

            

Your Gorleston Memories

Arthurs Gorleston Reflections

Darby's Hard Action Group

SEE OUR NEW PAGE OF GORLESTON MEMORIES IN SOUND

 Gorleston Memories in Sound

New Gorleston Conservarion Areas

Home

If you have any comments or concerns or want more information about  anything Gorleston please get in touch and I will endeavour to help.   This also applies to family history problems concerning Gorleston.

Either scroll down or go direct to an item by clicking below

Friends of Riverside Road Action  Group    Gorleston Pier Car Park     Some Facts About The Outer Harbour   Old First Aid Post    Missing Seats For  Shelters

GORLESTON  CONSERVATION NEWS

THIS IS A PAGE WHERE  I WILL ENDEAVOUR TO  REPORT  AREAS OF OUR TOWN EITHER IN DANGER OF UNWANTED CHANGE OR FUTURE THREAT.   PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ADD YOUR OWN CONCERNS BY CLICKING HERE

 

   ANOTHER AREA OF GORLESTON 'S HERITAGE AT RISK

The dolphins near Darby's Hard have been fenced off with an eight foot fence.   Our council say with a view to repairing this last area of natural riverside - a situation that needs watching very closely because often a council fence is the prelude to destruction of Gorleston heritage.  A real threat could come when and if a third river crossing becomes a reality and it is decided to use the area to be a layby for small boats waiting for the bridge to open.

Panorama of whole Darby's Hard area.   Dolphins and Ice House in distance.

The dolphins in their earlier days before the worst of the neglect

 

 

“FRIENDS OF RIVERSIDE ROAD”

We are local residents who care about the conservation of this particular part of Gorleston and have formed the above group.

Our objectives are to protect and preserve this very historical area and stop its deterioration.

Our three main objectives are:

                             

 

1) The dolphins (jetties): to improve them and to stop further deterioration.

 

2) The river defences, especially in the “Darby’s Hard” area: to be sympathetically strengthened.

 

3) The road: to have some sort of traffic calming and general maintenance.

 

 

 

 

 

 No not a third world country but this is the state of part of Riverside Road at Gorleston which believe it or not is a public road.

Until recently this riverside area was leased to the Port Authority on a repairing lease and now taken back by the council in this state.   Were dilapidations paid?   The whole riverside area is the only remaining natural riverside in the borough and has been allowed to deteriorate together with the wooden dolphins from what was once one of the most picturesque areas in the borough to its present dilapidated state.   Hundreds of thousand pounds were recently frittered away on giant TVs for Yarmouth which even  if they had been a success would have needed writing off in just a few years but that kind of investment here would not only be attractive but have a positive use for many decades.

 

Janet Tough Chairman, Barry Tough Vice Chairman, Pauline Dodd Secretary, Martin Dodd Treasurer.

If you would like to become involved or just kept up to date with our progress please contact us on 01493667148 or 01493442807 or email Pauline Dodd at pauline@paulinedodd.com

 

 www.friendsofriversideroad.co.uk

 

 

RETURN TO BEGINNING OF CONSERVATION PAGE

                                                                                          OLD FIRST AID POST ON GORLESTON SEAFRONT

Now the council has thrown out the plan for a hot and cold food kiosk most think the eye sore  in a conservation  area and should be demolished.

THE MISSING SEATS IN THE SHELTERS AND ON GORLESTON PROM.

There is a possibility that these will be replaced before this Summer.   Wait and watch.

 

GORLESTON PIER CAR PARK CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC

When is our council going to put pressure on Eastport who  now own the pier because it is now part of a conservation area.      

 Once again the port company has closed the car park so that residents and visitors are no longer able to enjoy parking there  to have the quite enjoyment of the sea views .    To the elderly and disabled it is a particular blow  as those unable to walk far have not only lost the enjoyment of the view but are denied being able  to take a short walk  along the pier. 

The reason cited is that the car park is uneven which is due to neglect over the years.   This statement is also partly untrue as the small amount being used of late is fine, which makes this reason invalid.   Another reason cited is because the barricade was removed by persons unknown.   What about the cctv cameras and the duty watch when this was happening?

 Please click below to sign our petition on the  website   Because this is another challenge to Gorleston's heritage against residents wishes and the viability of our resort.

t.ook at the picture above and ask yourself the question "is this how we want our pier to look?"    It's not on is it?  

I have now put a petition on the number 10 on line petition website.   which is non political but very convenient for our purpose.        click here to sign.

 

OUR OUTER HARBOUR  A LESSON IN SPIN

READ THE SAD TRUTH

WHAT WE WERE TOLD IN 2006

EastPort Update – South Norfolk Economic Implications

Summary: In 2000, EastPort Great Yarmouth Limited set out its vision for the future: a brand new outer harbour with state-of-the-art facilities, opening up a whole new world of trade opportunities for businesses in the region and returning the port to a leading position as a European gateway

The report summarises progress since then and potential impact upon the Economy of South Norfolk.

Conclusions: Eastport represents opportunities for the whole of the region and its impact will be felt in South Norfolk. Our support of its bid throughout the process will reap its own rewards through job creation and tourism spend. However we should remain cautious on assessing the extent of the latter. It is important that Panel members recognise the progress made thus far and understand the potential for structural changes to the local economy as a result

1. Introduction

1.1. In 2000, EastPort Great Yarmouth Limited set out its vision for the future: a brand new outer harbour with state-of-the-art facilities, opening up a whole new world oftrade opportunities for businesses in the region and returning the port to aleading position as a European gateway. 

1.2. Positioned as it is on one of the strategic Trans-European Network routes, GreatYarmouth is already a sizeable regional port with a large adjoining industrial area.The port handles general cargo, mainly for distribution to the local area. It is als othe principal UK base for the oil and gas industry in the Southern North Sea.However, the limited facilities are not currently suitable for larger commercial vessels, including roll-on/roll-off freight ferries.

1.3. The relative remoteness of Great Yarmouth has helped to restrict economic growth in recent years with the result of higher than average rates ofunemployment and low wage levels. Eastport will bring renewal to the town’s economic growth and confidence as both the public and private sector tackle the pockets of severe deprivation and social exclusion while working to improve thearea’s skills base and infrastructure.

1.4. The proposed EastPort, situated at the mouth of the River Yare is well placed to deliver ease and speed of navigation, with quick turn-round of vessels. Great Yarmouth is ideally located for a three-times daily ferry service each way to The Netherlands, offering the shortest route across the North Sea between the UK and the major Netherlands ports. The proposed harbour also caters for larger vessels which cannot access Great Yarmouth’s existing harbour, including general cargo and specialist offshore vessels.

1.5. The Outer Harbour will also reclaim significant amounts of underused land in Great Yarmouth, spur a major redevelopment and renewal of the area's infrastructure and provide new, year-round employment, as well as boosting local tourism and many other regional benefits.

2. Progress

2.1. The design of the project has come a long way since the concept was first mooted in the 1980s. The Outer Harbour will provide sufficient space for vessels of up to 210 metres length and 8.5 metres draught at all states of the tide, with at least one dedicated roll-on/roll-off terminal. There is also space for another, when required, and two general purpose quays will also be available

2.2. The project has also taken an important step forward with the selection of Superfast Ferries SA as the preferred bidder to provide a daily ferry service to the Netherlands. Superfast already operate the Rosyth to Zeebrugge service.

2.3. It is envisioned that this service would run to the port of IJmuiden, situated at the mouth of the Amsterdam canal just a few miles west of Amsterdam. The route between Great Yarmouth and IJmuiden is just 103 nautical miles - shorter than any current UK-Netherlands route.

2.4. To ensure a sound and successful commercial future for EastPort and Great commercial partners.

2.5. A multi-million pound funding bid has also been made to the European Objective 2 programme, co-ordinated by the Government Office for the East of England.

3. Latest Position

3.1. The East of England Development Agency (“EEDA”) and central government have fully appraised EastPort’s business case. In January 2005, the Department for Transport gave approval to the use of public funding to support the project and subsequently confirmation was received on an £18m public funding package to support the development.

3.2. In March 2005 the Outer Harbour scheme received approval from the Department of Trade and Industry to allow the East of England Development Agency to invest £8.75 million in the project.

3.3. In July 2005 Great Yarmouth's Outer Harbour project cleared another hurdle following the Department of Transport's decision to make a Harbour Revision Order, effectively giving planning permission for it to be built.

3.4. This means that EastPort now have all the necessary tools in place to progress to the next stage, which is to seek the private investment required to close the deal.

3.5. The harbour is projected to create around 1,000 jobs, bring over 120,000 extra visitors a year to the region and bring further significant private sector investment to an area earmarked for regeneration.

3.6. The primary rationale for public funding of EastPort rests on the social benefits of regenerating a deprived area and reducing local unemployment. The decision on funding is therefore based on the weight attached to the social and wider economic regeneration benefits which it could bring to Great Yarmouth and its

3.7. It is the intention of the U.K. authorities that the development of the outer harbour be implemented through a public-private partnership (“PPP”), with part of the financing coming from the public sector. The public funding from state resources is approximately £13.425 million (€19.5 million) coming from the East of England Development Authority, Norfolk County Council and Great Yarmouth Borough Council. Additionally the sum of £4.575 million (€6.78m) of European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) has been applied for financing under Objective 2. This is the subject of a separate Major Project Notification to the European Commission.

3.8. Financing for the Yarmouth outer harbour looks almost guaranteed following a flurry of interest from the private sector. With the deadline or expressions of interest in funding the scheme passing recently, Eastport UK Ltd officials say hopes are high that the necessary partnerships will be secured.

4. Impact for South Norfolk

4.1. Undoubtedly, the regeneration of EastPort will impact upon the nature and substance of

4.2. Distribution networks, previously limited by our rural location, will be augmented as this route becomes a major new transport artery to Northern Europe from theMidlands, bringing infrastructure improvements, new employment and many other benefits. This will have transport planning implications and it is possible that routes other than the A47 will become popular with users of the facility.

4.3. The message that regional partners need to understand is that EastPort truly turns the region on its head. When it opens, no longer will people travel south to get to the continent, but instead use Norfolk as its route to market.

4.4. This in itself will attract investment, business creation and aid lobbying efforts for other infrastructure improvements for Norfolk.

4.5. Sectors including Distribution, Engineering, Construction and Agriculture may see a changing marketplace as products from the near continent are more readily available. However, the flipside is that exporting will be more in the forefront of business thinking resulting in a far more fluid economy for goods and services.

4.6. The oft-quoted benefits to Tourism are less easy to quantify. Indeed the volume of tourist traffic is a lesser element of the initiative at this stage. We will have to wait and see how we can ensure we gain our share as the project develops. It is fair to say, however that Business Tourism will form a large part of the project visitor numbers, pointing to growth in the larger hotels and conference venues. We already have links with the Great Yarmouth Marketing Initiative (GYMI) to aid this as it happens.

4.7. Job creation figures vary from differing sources and a definitive economic impact assessment is due in the next three months using EEDA funding. It initially states that a large majority of jobs will be in Great Yarmouth and Lowestoft, however it further recognises the regional job creation potential of the development. Up to 1000 roles will depend on its completion.

4.8. It is possible to foresee a modest increase in jobs in the local area, particularly in distribution and marine services however the biggest change will be in the adaptation of other sectors in accepting and exploring international markets previously not considered. South Norfolk Council and partners can be at the vanguard in promoting and developing advice in this regard.

4.9. East of England International will play a key role in talking with our key employers. Similarly there will be opportunity for Norfolk and probably South Norfolk to be considered a viable UK HQ for European firms.

5. Conclusion

5.1. Eastport represents opportunities for the whole of the region and its impact will be felt in South Norfolk. Our support of its bid throughout the process will reap its own rewards through job creation and tourism spend. However we should remain cautious on assessing the extent of the latter.

5.2. It is important that Panel members recognise the progress made thus far and understand the potential for structural changes to the local economy as a result.

NOW WASN'T THAT A DAINTY TALE TO SET BEFORE THE RESIDENTS  -   JUST LIKE A NURSERY RHYME EXCEPT THERE WASN'T A HAPPY ENDING!   WHAT DID WE GET?     A CONTAINER TERMINAL, AGGREGATE HEAP, GRAIN STORE, CEMENT WORKS.   NOW IF ANYONE CAN MAKE 1000 JOBS OUT OF THAT LOT WHAT ABOUT THE 120,000 TOURISTS?   WHERE ARE THE EASY WEEKEND TRIPS TO THE CONTINENT FOR LOCALS?    JUST HOW MUCH SPIN WAS IN THE ORIGINAL PROPAGANDA FED TO THE POOR TAXPAYERS TO KEEP THEM ON SIDE.  INSTEAD WE ARE GOING TO GET:  ADDED COSTS ONTO OUR COUNCIL TAX, NOISE AND DUST POLLUTION, CHAOS ON OUR ROAD SYSTEM NOT FORGETTING THE NECESSITY OF A COSTLY NEW BRIDGE TO CARRY ALL THOSE LORRIES ACROSS THE RIVER.   THIS ISN'T SPIN BUT REALITY.   

IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN KNOWING MORE PLEASE CLICK HERE

Local Time Dep./Arr. Port Vessel's Name
2011-09-24 10:55 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-24 10:11 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH BEVER
2011-09-24 10:11 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH SEA GOLF
2011-09-24 09:52 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH VOS RAASAY
2011-09-24 09:00 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH FELAURA
2011-09-24 08:24 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH EASTERN AURA
2011-09-24 07:52 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-24 07:45 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH TOISA WARRIOR
2011-09-24 07:41 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH FELAURA
2011-09-24 04:44 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH REM PROVIDER
2011-09-24 01:01 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-24 00:49 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH ATLANTIC GUARDIAN
2011-09-23 22:55 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-23 21:18 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-23 21:18 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PUTFORD ENTERPRISE
2011-09-23 19:30 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-23 19:30 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH VOS WARRIOR
2011-09-23 18:58 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-23 17:23 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH FELAURA
2011-09-23 15:42 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PUTFORD SAVIOUR
2011-09-23 13:28 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH SMIT BUFFALO
2011-09-23 13:24 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH GENESIS OF GT YAR
2011-09-23 12:37 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH FELAURA
2011-09-23 12:02 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH FELAURA
2011-09-23 11:54 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH GMS ENDEAVOUR 6102
2011-09-23 11:54 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH GMS ENDEAVOUR 6102
2011-09-23 11:54 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH CONCEP
2011-09-23 11:54 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH CONCEP
2011-09-23 10:28 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH FELAURA
2011-09-23 07:54 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH GREY VIXEN
2011-09-23 07:38 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH SMIT BUFFALO
2011-09-23 06:31 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH MARINECO SHAMAL
2011-09-23 01:55 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH ATLANTIC GUARDIAN
2011-09-23 01:55 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH SMIT BUFFALO
2011-09-23 01:54 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-23 00:51 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-23 00:51 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH MARINER SEA
2011-09-22 22:32 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-22 19:23 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-22 19:21 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH CONSTRUCTOR
2011-09-22 18:51 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-22 18:51 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH KORIANGI
2011-09-22 18:18 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-22 17:50 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH FELAURA
2011-09-22 17:42 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PUTFORD JAGUAR
2011-09-22 16:00 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PUTFORD ATHENA
2011-09-22 15:59 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT MALLARD
2011-09-22 14:59 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH FELAURA
2011-09-22 11:46 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH PILOT BOAT BURE 2
2011-09-22 11:45 DEPARTURE GREAT YARMOUTH SBS TORRENT

First page Previous page page 1/2 Next page Last page

13 comments

bullet
Mr Cooper, I'll ignore your childish name calling and stick to the discussion. Perhaps you could try to do the same. I didn't say the pier structure was poor, I said the car park was. There is no usable surface left on it. It would need new drainage putting in, and new surfacing laid. This would cost tens of thousands of pounds. So, again I'll ask you. Who do you feel should be paying to do this work to get the car park open again?

Add your comment | Report this comment

Tea&Biscuits

Friday, September 30, 2011

bullet
Tea & B you are obviously in the pocket of someone! And as you have no name you have no democracy. Democracy is what all this is about. Because of this one sided deal two people have been given all the assets, whilst our councillors took on all the liabilities. Rates have to pay for repairs to hundreds of yards of quays, cars not being allowed to park on the Gorleston Pier. Our Port Authority have no say to how our Port river or outer functions. You talk rubbish about the Pier Structure, this August there were numerous vehicles parked on the Pier INCLUDING two 30 ton cement lorries at the same time. No T&B the difference between you and me you are not democratic only interested in what you can take. I have nothing to gain my interest is having Ratepayers treated fairly, which includes ratepayers for generations to come

Add your comment | Report this comment

John L Cooper

Friday, September 30, 2011

bullet
John Cooper, payout?, sponsoring? sleeping with a councillor? Is this really the most intelligent response you can manage to a discussion? I suggest you stop the personal insults and respond in relation to the story discussion. Maybe then people *may* take you more seriously. Or do you actually need Mr Durrant to fight your battles for you? Back on topic, the pier car park is in a terrible state and would take thousands of pounds to make it safe for the public to use. Who are you suggesting should pay for this? GYBC using "ratepayers" money? Also, should there be a charge to use the car park if it opens? I can't see how the car park can self finance.

Add your comment | Report this comment

Tea&Biscuits

Friday, September 30, 2011

bullet
I'm sorry tea&biscuits” you must start thinking laterally. The pier car park is a special place used by residents and visitors for years. It was a place where disabled and aged visitors and residents could park and sit and watch the scene and perhaps enjoy a short walk along the pier. Not only did these people enjoy a stop there but also many others as you would understand if you ever used the park or walked along the pier. Also popular with fishermen to bring tgheir gear and have their car handy to shelter during sudden squalls. I wish you knew sufficient about the outer harbour deal to make useful observations or comments so I will call it a day while the invitation to contact me for a meeting stands. It will be much more productive for us both to meet face to face.

Add your comment | Report this comment

gorleston.boy

Friday, September 30, 2011

bullet
Part 1 Sorry for all this need to split up but it wouldn't accept as a whole Well “Tea&Biscuits” John Cooper isn't feared to add his name to what he writes and you know where he is coming from. Yourself and “hptw” are an entirely different kettle of fish. Perhaps from your nomme de plume it means you are a civil servant? “hptw” could be of the same ilk because they like lots of abbreviations that nobody bar themselves understands. I use the name of “gorleston boy” so people know my connection to that I write about but I am happy to tell you that I am Dennis Durrant in my other life and have the Gorleston Heritage website from where you can contact me because I would be very happy to meet and explain in more detail what has been happening in our town and John Cooper's part in it. He has spent the last four years researching the outer harbour saga because he has a lifetimes involvement in the port, finishing as the Port Mission Officer.

Add your comment | Report this comment

gorleston.boy

Friday, September 30, 2011

bullet
Tea & B take your payout from what ever body is sponsoring you and go away. If you cannot divulge your name, then sorry the Residents can never take you seriously. Can I ask, which councillor are you sleeping with?

Add your comment | Report this comment

John L Cooper

Friday, September 30, 2011

bullet
I would love to be able to meet you two people to go into a lot more detail which I think from part three what you have written you should learn before criticising a man who is trying to make sense of the whole outer harbour deal. We aren't anti outer harbour but want openness and honesty from GYBC

Add your comment | Report this comment

gorleston.boy

Friday, September 30, 2011

bullet
Part 2 Far from hijacking anything the MP asked to meet us on the pier because he said we were the only people who were writing to him on the subject. The prove this statement wrong we just let one or two more people who were critical about what we had lost about our meeting. The result was that over fifty people in the Pier Hotel complained to Brandon Lewis about the the pier car park AND the road which runs by the outer harbour. Mr. Lewis agreed to arrange a meeting with the council to allow residents to raise their concerns. This meeting was hijacked by GYBC who decided it was to only be about Gorleston parking and for various reasons,one being Halloween it couldn’t be arranged until 21st November. We now have six weeks to put objections in concerning parking on the prom. BUT the meeting takes place over two weeks after this date. Seem strange to you? This is the kind jiggery pokery we have become used to with GYBC.

Add your comment | Report this comment

gorleston.boy

Friday, September 30, 2011

bullet
I take that response as meaning you have no meaningful reply. Also, why are the Cooper & Durrant duo campaigning for the pier car park to be reopened, when Mr Durrant states in this story that "parking was only a problem in the peak summer weeks and there were plenty of spaces at all other times". Surely if the prom isn't needed for extra parking, neither is the pier?

Add your comment | Report this comment

Tea&Biscuits

Friday, September 30, 2011

bullet
Tea and B and hptw Show some guts use your real names stop hiding like little girls

Add your comment | Report this comment

John L Cooper

Friday, September 30, 2011

bullet
You beat me to it Tea&Biscuits - pot and kettle spring to mind

Add your comment | Report this comment

hptw

Friday, September 30, 2011

bullet
Yet again a story hijacked by Mr Cooper. How can you take a story about a parking proposal on Gorleston seafront, and turn it into questions which are totally irrelevent to it? The road through the outer harbour? What has that got to do with Gorleston seafront parking? You complain about a future meeting being hijacked? Isn't that what you did with the MP meeting you had, where it was supposed to be about the pier car park, but you hijacked it for yet another moan about the outer harbour?

Add your comment | Report this comment

Tea&Biscuits

Friday, September 30, 2011

bullet
Reading Steve Ames comment: “I would hope the proposal is accepted in a positive way as it opens up the area for more people to enjoy”.August 4th 2011 the meeting at the Pier Hotel told Brandon Lewis MP that the Gorleston residents wanted their questions answered regarding the Pier carpark, Rates paying for the West Bank repairs, and the Road closure through the outer harbour. Our MP agreed this meeting should happen. In a telephone call to me on the 13th of August Steve Ames said this would happen in November, as that is the soonest that it can be arranged. The meeting has been highjacked, the promise of our questions being answered is scuppered, because our council do not want these questions to asked by residents, as when they gave our port free of charge to IPH they did something that they are either ashamed of, or something so serious that they want to keep it hidden. What did they let happen in our names?

Add your comment | Report this comment

John L Cooper

Thursday, September 29, 2011